Are Pipplet evaluations stricter than those of other language tests?

Pipplet Team • 29 août 2019

Updated May 6, 2021

 

We sometimes receive feedback from our candidates and clients that the final results achieved on a Pipplet test were lower than they were expecting, or lower than results on other tests. We understand it can be frustrating, however, below we explain a few reasons why this can happen.

Results are not stricter, they're more accurate

 

We mark our tests based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages - a document developed by the Council of Europe following several years of research about what it means to be "good" in a given language.

 

The framework has 6 levels, from A1 to C2. Given that C2 would generally represent the level of a person who has lived abroad for 40 years and mastered all the intricacies of a language, it’s logical to expect a student who has 4 years of classroom experience may "only" be at a B1 level. Why? Because there is still room for improvement in their mastery of the language. We believe in the principle of the framework, so we stick to it.

Additionally, the framework distinguishes between different language skills: comprehension (reading and listening) and expression (oral and written). While many tests are content with only evaluating comprehension, Pipplet also evaluates expression. Humans are generally better at comprehension than expression, so as a result, the overall test result can be lower.

 

A holistic view

 

Our goal is to ensure recruiters and language teachers are given a holistic view of language proficiency. For recruiting, Pipplet results are often used to filter applications efficiently and for language centers, Pipplet is used as a way to measure and exhibit progress following a language course. For each of these reasons, it’s important that the results:

 

  • Accurately distinguish the level of language skill between candidates. If everyone gets the same score, how can we differentiate between them?
  • Provide consistent results. Only the application of the CEFR makes it possible to ensure uniformity and comparability of results over time

 

B2 level is better than you think

While a Pipplet grade may be lower than you or your candidate expected, you can rest assured that all dimensions of language proficiency are assessed, using an objective and consistent method. It’s not to say that a candidate is not as “good” as you, or they imagined, rather a level B1 or B2 is a much better level than most generally perceive it to be.

 

Related stories

Avoiding Discrimination in Language Requirements: A Guide for Inclusive Hiring
par Pipplet Team 27 novembre 2024
Language can connect us across borders, but in recruitment, the way we frame language requirements can unintentionally create barriers. Missteps in job postings can discourage talented candidates and limit diversity, even when the intent is to attract talent.
How Skills Assessments Can Enhance the Candidate Experience
par Pipplet Team 15 novembre 2024
Get expert insights into the impact of assessments on the candidate experience, and how to set a positive tone. Pipplet has always strived to provide a quality, user-friendly experience in language assessments.
Recruiting for the IT Industry? Pay Attention to Language Skills
par Pipplet Team 8 octobre 2024
Considering the trend toward remote work and globally distributed teams, companies not hiring for language proficiency may be missing opportunities and limiting their view of what’s ahead despite clear indicators of what’s driving market growth.
Show more
Share by: